An editorial today on The Capital Times site suggests that Madison should embrace Alderman Mike Verveer’s proposal to restrict sales of cheap alcohol downtown. The CT says:
The truth is that sales of cheap booze should be regulated. It is unlikely that Verveer’s proposal will address every social ill or challenge associated with such sales, but it is the beginning of a rational response — a response that can be tinkered with, extended or otherwise altered as evidence suggests is wise.
I’m sorry, I thought prohibition was overturned in 1933.
For a city that is supposed to be open and liberal, an ordinance governing what types of alcohol can and cannot be sold seems extremely hypocritical.
Verveer’s proposal limits choice – the choice of everyone of legal drinking age. Some may enjoy the cheap goodness of Mountain Creek, or want a six pack of it to boil brats.
A city should not treat its residents like 12 year olds. Anyone that can purchase alcohol is an adult, and this law undermines the decision making ability of adults. Just because Mr. Verveer has a government job where he can afford to drink the more expensive beer that would be “legal” in Madison does not mean he should dictate what others can buy.
We are adults. While some are more responsible than others, we live in a country where we are free to choose and live with our choices. The Capital Times recommendation and Verveer’s proposal goes against everything our country stands for, and therefor should not be imposed.
Place your comment